[Politics/Religion] Wingtard heads are about to explode

[gleek]

Link

[MFAWG]

"This ruling that a state can mandate to the federal government the definition of marriage for the sake of receiving federal benefits, we find really bizarre, rather arrogant, if I may say so,"

LOL, how do you square that view with your view that states can opt out fo ObamaCAre!!TY!!!?

[MFAWG]

This is pretty LULZY too:

Paul Clement, a Washington, D.C., attorney who defended the law on behalf of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, argued that Congress had a rational basis for passing it in 1996, when opponents worried that states would be forced to recognize gay marriages performed elsewhere. The group said Congress wanted to preserve a traditional and uniform definition of marriage and has the power to define terms used to federal statutes to distribute federal benefits.

See, it's a BIPARTISAN group. Says so right in the name!