gleek
Flak Jacket
Karma: 107 Posts: 9511
OfflineE chu ta!
|
|
Ron Paul
« on: July 29, 2007, 12:12:40 AM » |
|
Any chance he wins the GOP nomination?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Woman, open the door, don't let it sting. I wanna breathe that fire again.
|
|
|
MP
Vest & Plus Fours From: CA
Karma: 7 Posts: 725
OfflineOne in the pink two in the stink!
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2007, 12:38:54 AM » |
|
I thought he was the GOP backrunner last I remember. FWIW I like a republican who doesn't like his president.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MFAWG
Rich Corinthian Leather Jacket
Karma: 31 Posts: 5720
Offline
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2007, 05:45:45 AM » |
|
The 2 most compelling guys (Paul, Gravel) don't have a shot.
Then again:
Anybody remember who the presumptive nominees in 1999 were?
|
|
|
Logged
|
The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the get rich quick theory of life. -- Teddy Roosevelt
|
|
|
stroh
Sleeveless Hoodie From: Impact Crater Springs, CA
Karma: 155 Posts: 16135
OfflineWe're doomed!
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2007, 06:38:04 AM » |
|
I was thinking this thread was about Ru Paul.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Aske
Lederhosen
Karma: 120 Posts: 31405
Offline
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2007, 06:50:36 AM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Russia has invaded a sovereign neighboring state and threatens a democratic government elected by its people. Such an action is unacceptable in the 21st century. -- Chimpy McFlightsuit, CEO of Bu$hco Industries of 'Merka
|
|
|
hobbit
Tartan Jacket From: The Shire
Karma: 27 Posts: 1823
Offline
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2007, 11:33:34 AM » |
|
FWIW I like a republican who doesn't like his president. He's only a republican in name; his heart, viewpoints, and voting record are more libertarian than anything else (many people refer to him as a libertarian too). I would support him if it wasn't for his crusade against the Federal Reserve system and wanting to go to a 'gold standard'. There are reasons to dislike or distrust the Fed, but the gold standard is a horrible 'solution'. Oh - and he likely has no shot at the nomination. He's not 'republican' enough - which is a good thing IMO; but won't win the hearts, minds, and most importantly - the pocketbooks, of traditional republican benefactors.
|
|
« Last Edit: July 29, 2007, 11:37:02 AM by rickhicks »
|
Logged
|
I've gone to find myself. If I get back before I return, keep me here.
|
|
|
Walfredo
Straitjacket
Karma: 18 Posts: 2013
OfflinePaintin the town brown
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2007, 08:16:14 AM » |
|
FWIW I like a republican who doesn't like his president. He's only a republican in name; his heart, viewpoints, and voting record are more libertarian than anything else (many people refer to him as a libertarian too). I would support him if it wasn't for his crusade against the Federal Reserve system and wanting to go to a 'gold standard'. There are reasons to dislike or distrust the Fed, but the gold standard is a horrible 'solution'. Oh - and he likely has no shot at the nomination. He's not 'republican' enough - which is a good thing IMO; but won't win the hearts, minds, and most importantly - the pocketbooks, of traditional republican benefactors. Forgive my stupidity but to whom are you referring?
|
|
|
Logged
|
For hither not, I am the stallion. Come fear, come love, I am the stallion. You know that I am the stallion, mang. I am, I am the stallion, mang. You know that I am the stallion, mang. I live, I walk, I am the stallion, mang.
|
|
|
Blader
Straitjacket
Karma: 21 Posts: 2075
Offlinevagazzling vajayjays since 1876!!
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2007, 08:24:18 AM » |
|
FWIW I like a republican who doesn't like his president. He's only a republican in name; his heart, viewpoints, and voting record are more libertarian than anything else (many people refer to him as a libertarian too). I would support him if it wasn't for his crusade against the Federal Reserve system and wanting to go to a 'gold standard'. There are reasons to dislike or distrust the Fed, but the gold standard is a horrible 'solution'. Oh - and he likely has no shot at the nomination. He's not 'republican' enough - which is a good thing IMO; but won't win the hearts, minds, and most importantly - the pocketbooks, of traditional republican benefactors. Forgive my stupidity but to whom are you referring? Way back when, he was one of only 6 republican congressman to vote against the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hobbit
Tartan Jacket From: The Shire
Karma: 27 Posts: 1823
Offline
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2007, 12:05:53 PM » |
|
FWIW I like a republican who doesn't like his president. He's only a republican in name; his heart, viewpoints, and voting record are more libertarian than anything else (many people refer to him as a libertarian too). I would support him if it wasn't for his crusade against the Federal Reserve system and wanting to go to a 'gold standard'. There are reasons to dislike or distrust the Fed, but the gold standard is a horrible 'solution'. Oh - and he likely has no shot at the nomination. He's not 'republican' enough - which is a good thing IMO; but won't win the hearts, minds, and most importantly - the pocketbooks, of traditional republican benefactors. Forgive my stupidity but to whom are you referring? Uh.... Ron Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
I've gone to find myself. If I get back before I return, keep me here.
|
|
|
Walfredo
Straitjacket
Karma: 18 Posts: 2013
OfflinePaintin the town brown
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2007, 12:24:16 PM » |
|
FWIW I like a republican who doesn't like his president. He's only a republican in name; his heart, viewpoints, and voting record are more libertarian than anything else (many people refer to him as a libertarian too). I would support him if it wasn't for his crusade against the Federal Reserve system and wanting to go to a 'gold standard'. There are reasons to dislike or distrust the Fed, but the gold standard is a horrible 'solution'. Oh - and he likely has no shot at the nomination. He's not 'republican' enough - which is a good thing IMO; but won't win the hearts, minds, and most importantly - the pocketbooks, of traditional republican benefactors. Forgive my stupidity but to whom are you referring? Uh.... Ron Paul I thought MP and you were talking bout someone else. Now I get it. FWIW, I checked out his website. He doesn't sound too bad for a repub so he definately won't win the nomination. And what is up with the Gold Standard thing. Kind of hard to take him seriously after that.
|
|
|
Logged
|
For hither not, I am the stallion. Come fear, come love, I am the stallion. You know that I am the stallion, mang. I am, I am the stallion, mang. You know that I am the stallion, mang. I live, I walk, I am the stallion, mang.
|
|
|
Blader
Straitjacket
Karma: 21 Posts: 2075
Offlinevagazzling vajayjays since 1876!!
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2007, 12:49:00 PM » |
|
I'm really not prone to the whole "cult of personality' mindset when it comes to handicapping political candidates, but Ron Paul sort of reminds me of what Ross Perot would be if he were a history professor, except Ross Perot is much more like a crack addict.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gleek
Flak Jacket
Karma: 107 Posts: 9511
OfflineE chu ta!
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2007, 12:53:29 PM » |
|
FWIW I like a republican who doesn't like his president. He's only a republican in name; his heart, viewpoints, and voting record are more libertarian than anything else (many people refer to him as a libertarian too). I would support him if it wasn't for his crusade against the Federal Reserve system and wanting to go to a 'gold standard'. There are reasons to dislike or distrust the Fed, but the gold standard is a horrible 'solution'. Oh - and he likely has no shot at the nomination. He's not 'republican' enough - which is a good thing IMO; but won't win the hearts, minds, and most importantly - the pocketbooks, of traditional republican benefactors. Forgive my stupidity but to whom are you referring? Uh.... Ron Paul I thought MP and you were talking bout someone else. Now I get it. FWIW, I checked out his website. He doesn't sound too bad for a repub so he definately won't win the nomination. And what is up with the Gold Standard thing. Kind of hard to take him seriously after that. I think that's just part of his ideology (i.e. that the government shouldn't be able to print money willy-nilly without having anything of intrinsic value to back it up), but IMHO he's pretty realistic about how much change he's going to be able to bring to fruition in 4-8 years. One of the primary sticking points with "libs" might be his pro-life stance, which is based on his rather pedantic position on individual rights. Unlike pro-lifers who believe that it's simply evil to kill fetuses, Paul is more interested in protecting the rights of the fetus. In addition, I think he doesn't believe that the federal government should even have a position on the pro-choice/pro-life debate. I really love that he's a staunch "constitutionalist" and is adamantly opposed to big government, but some of his positions almost make him sound like anarchist. Still I think he's a realistic about whether or not he can do away with the IRS in his first 100 days. Edit: BTW, I don't know *8==>* about this guy other than what I've seen on YouTube. I'm really just talking out of my ass at this point. It will be really interesting to see if a guy can win the nomination and eventually the presidency through a true grassroots campaign on teh internets. This will speak volumes about the power of technology (and YouTube/Google).
|
|
« Last Edit: July 30, 2007, 01:00:07 PM by gleek »
|
Logged
|
Woman, open the door, don't let it sting. I wanna breathe that fire again.
|
|
|
Blader
Straitjacket
Karma: 21 Posts: 2075
Offlinevagazzling vajayjays since 1876!!
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2007, 01:07:51 PM » |
|
His positions are far too liberal to mobilize the goosestep conservative masses, and far too conservative to suck support from the reality-based voter bloc
In the end, Paul will prove that even youtube has its limitations
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
1puttpar
Vest & Plus Fours From: Loomis, CA
Karma: 16 Posts: 717
Offline
|
|
Re: Ron Paul
« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2007, 01:56:04 PM » |
|
I was told by a wise old man, many years ago:
"Don't trust anybody with 2 first names."
|
|
|
Logged
|
I really hate Vista
|
|
|