Darla
Vest & Plus Fours From: I'm with stupid
Karma: 14 Posts: 861
 Offline
 
|
 |
R. Kelly found not guilty in child-pröñ case
« on: June 13, 2008, 11:01:06 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged 
|
|
|
|
spacey
Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat From: Group W Bench
Karma: 98 Posts: 7733
Offline
|
|
Re: R. Kelly found not guilty in child-pröñ case
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2008, 11:03:33 PM » |
|
Well that just pisses me off.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stroh
Sleeveless Hoodie From: Impact Crater Springs, CA
Karma: 155 Posts: 16135
OfflineWe're doomed!
|
|
Re: R. Kelly found not guilty in child-pröñ case
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2008, 06:42:33 AM » |
|
Well that just pisses me off.
werd. oj.surrenders |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gleek
Flak Jacket
Karma: 107 Posts: 9511
OfflineE chu ta!
|
|
Re: R. Kelly found not guilty in child-pröñ case
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2008, 09:39:38 AM » |
|
What a pisser!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Woman, open the door, don't let it sting. I wanna breathe that fire again.
|
|
|
stroh
Sleeveless Hoodie From: Impact Crater Springs, CA
Karma: 155 Posts: 16135
OfflineWe're doomed!
|
|
Re: R. Kelly found not guilty in child-pröñ case
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2008, 09:51:25 AM » |
|
Urine over your head.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MFAWG
Rich Corinthian Leather Jacket
Karma: 31 Posts: 5720
Offline
|
|
Re: R. Kelly found not guilty in child-pröñ case
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2008, 07:54:30 PM » |
|
This would seem to be a problem: http://www.slate.com/id/2193649 As Kelly's lawyers mentioned multiple times, the alleged victim in this case—now a 23-year-old woman—told a grand jury that it wasn't her. While 15 friends and relatives testified that the girl in question was indeed on the video, neither the alleged victim nor her parents showed up in court to testify for either side. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living and the get rich quick theory of life. -- Teddy Roosevelt
|
|
|
gleek
Flak Jacket
Karma: 107 Posts: 9511
OfflineE chu ta!
|
|
Re: R. Kelly found not guilty in child-pröñ case
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2008, 08:01:00 PM » |
|
Why is this called a "child pröñ" case? Shouldn't this be called a "child ****" case? Isn't the "pröñ" part merely the video evidence of the illegal act that occurred?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Woman, open the door, don't let it sting. I wanna breathe that fire again.
|
|
|
stroh
Sleeveless Hoodie From: Impact Crater Springs, CA
Karma: 155 Posts: 16135
OfflineWe're doomed!
|
|
Re: R. Kelly found not guilty in child-pröñ case
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2008, 08:08:15 PM » |
|
Good point.
Sick *fudge*, as spacey would say.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
birdymaker
Straitjacket From: a third world country in the making
Karma: 18 Posts: 2923
Offline
|
|
Re: R. Kelly found not guilty in child-pröñ case
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2008, 08:08:46 PM » |
|
Why is this called a "child pröñ" case? Shouldn't this be called a "child ****" case? Isn't the "pröñ" part merely the video evidence of the illegal act that occurred?
once the tape fell into the hands of a third party it became kiddie pron. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
women are like tornados. In the beginning there's a lot of sucking and blowing. In the end, the car's gone, the house is gone..
|
|
|
Spanky
Full Metal Jacket
Karma: 48 Posts: 4842
Offline
|
|
Re: R. Kelly found not guilty in child-pröñ case
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2008, 08:49:53 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
